Singularity Foundation

The foundation

How the Foundation works

The manifesto says what we believe. This charter says what the Foundation does, who decides, how its money and wallets are handled, and when it would stop.

I. Why the Foundation exists

The Singularity Foundation exists to argue, in public and with evidence, that machine intelligence greater than our own, and the robotics it will command, is the best thing that will ever happen to humanity, and to help it arrive sooner and arrive well.

Most people still meet the singularity as science fiction or as a threat. The evidence tells a different story: capability is compounding on curves that can be measured, and the people closest to the work expect it to transform medicine, science and the economy within our lifetimes. That story deserves an institution that tells it plainly and backs it with sources.

The Foundation is funded by people who share the thesis, and it has a public token, SFSI, through which anyone can stand behind it. Because a crypto foundation is only as trustworthy as its disclosures, this charter puts the rules for wallets, grants and conflicts in writing.

II. What we do

  1. 2.1
    Make the case

    We publish the argument for the singularity: its evidence, its promise and its strongest objections.

  2. 2.2
    Track the curve

    We maintain a public index of AI and robotics progress, every figure linked to its source.

  3. 2.3
    Fund open work

    We make grants and bounties for open-source AI, robotics and safety work that brings the future forward.

  4. 2.4
    Forecast in public

    We record dated, probabilistic forecasts and score them publicly.

  5. 2.5
    Keep the archive

    We keep the primary sources behind our claims in a permanent, public archive.

III. Programmes

Four lines of work, each with a public output and a regular rhythm.

ProgrammeWhat it doesOutputRhythm
ATrack the curvePublic index of task horizons, training compute, benchmarks, robotics milestones and public attention, each with its source.Live index and dataContinuous
BExplain itThe case for the singularity in plain language; primary sources archived.Essays and archiveMonthly
CBack the buildersGrants and bounties for open AI, robotics and safety work.Grants and on-chain ledgerQuarterly
DForecast in publicDated, probabilistic forecasts with written resolution criteria; annual Brier scoring.Registry and score reportAnnual

Every grant under line C is published with its amount, recipient and purpose, and the transaction that paid it.

IV. Governance

  1. 4.1
    Board

    Five members, with at least two from outside AI and crypto (law, medicine, economics or public policy). Three-year terms, maximum two terms.

  2. 4.2
    Advisory panel

    At least seven people from AI research, robotics, economics and crypto security. Critics of the thesis are invited to publish responses on the Foundation's site.

  3. 4.3
    Editorial independence

    Grantees and donors have no say over what the Foundation publishes.

  4. 4.4
    Decision thresholds

    Ordinary decisions by simple majority. Charter amendments, dissolution, and any change to the wallet and treasury rules in chapter V require a three-quarters majority.

  5. 4.5
    Dissenting opinions

    Board members in the minority may attach written reasons to any decision; those dissents are published with it.

V. Money, wallets and conflicts of interest

  1. 5.1
    Public wallets

    Every wallet the Foundation controls is listed on this site with its address. A wallet that is not listed is not the Foundation's.

  2. 5.2
    Announced movements

    Any transfer of SFSI out of a Foundation wallet is announced, with its purpose, before it is made. Grant payments are the exception; they are published within seven days.

  3. 5.3
    Quarterly accounts

    Income, spending and holdings are published every quarter, in fiat and on-chain terms.

  4. 5.4
    Personal disclosure

    Board members, advisors and staff declare their SFSI holdings and any stake in AI or crypto companies in a public register, and announce any SFSI they buy or sell.

  5. 5.5
    One official token

    The Foundation's only token is SFSI, on Solana. Any other token using the name is not ours.

VI. Publication standard

Everything the Foundation publishes about AI meets these rules.

  1. 6.1
    A source for every figure

    Every number links to the primary source it comes from.

  2. 6.2
    Strongest objection

    Every major claim is published with the strongest objection to it and our answer.

  3. 6.3
    Error log

    Claims that turn out to be wrong are not deleted. They stay published with the date and reason for correction.

  4. 6.4
    Optimism on the record

    Our forecasts carry dates and probabilities so our optimism can be checked, not just admired.

VII. Roadmap

2026 Q4
  • SFSI launched on Solana
  • Archive opens: 766 studies, 17 themes, full-text sources
  • Forecast registry opens
  • Foundation wallets listed publicly
2027
  • Singularity index goes live
  • First grant round for open AI and robotics work
  • First forecast score report
2028
  • Robotics milestones added to the index
  • Grant rounds two and three, with on-chain ledger
  • Advisory panel expanded to robotics and economics
2029
  • Three-year public review of every programme
  • Charter review

VIII. When the Foundation would stop

A foundation with no conditions for stopping has made its own survival the goal. These conditions are binding.

  1. 8.1
    Silence

    If the Foundation publishes nothing for 24 months, it dissolves. Existing is no substitute for working.

  2. 8.2
    Broken disclosure

    If a Foundation wallet is found to have moved funds in breach of chapter V, the finding is published and the Board must answer it in public within 30 days.

  3. 8.3
    Remaining assets

    On dissolution, remaining assets go to open AI, robotics or safety work, chosen by the Board and published with the transactions.

  4. 8.4
    Purpose voided

    Per article X of the manifesto: if the trajectory of this technology stops treating the human as the end, everything the Foundation defends becomes void, and the Board is obliged to say so.


The programmes in more detail: programmes.